A Word From Our Sponsor On Protecting Your Nursing Home With A Professional Liability Insurance Policy

Owning an establishment that is responsible for providing quality health care to patients and residents can be faced with all kinds of problems. It is no secret that today’s society expects the care of residents to be provided by professionals that have the best interest of each person in mind. Unfortunately, even the best health care facilities can experience some fallout from the poor conduct of an employee. For this reason, many nursing homes have been looking to invest in the protection that can come from having nursing home professional liability insurance.
Some insurance policies are meant to provide protection to your residents, while others, like nursing home professional liability insurance, aim to protect your establishment in situations where an employee’s conduct may have been less than standard procedure. Having this type of insurance coverage can help you in the event of an abuse or malpractice lawsuit. It can also offer protection in court cases that have been the result of an action that was intended to be harmless, but was taken offensively. Whatever the case, nursing home professional liability insurance coverage can work to protect you and your establishment from things that may occur within your facility that are outside of your control.
It is important that you feel confident in your employees’ ability to provide good care to your residents, and you may just find that extra bit of confidence with this type of insurance policy. There are insurance providers out there that are ready and willing to work with you to meet the needs of your establishment. If your nursing home doesn’t have a professional liability insurance policy, it may be a wise decision to research the benefits that this type of coverage can offer.

 

Can You Say ‘Grand Central’ in One Image?

The light at the end of the tunnel may be an illuminated clock face.

In a sign that the Metro-North Railroad is preparing to celebrate the centenary of Grand Central Terminal next year, a new logo began appearing this week on display screens in the main concourse. It is a stylized but instantly recognizable version of the four-faced clock that crowns the central information booth and has served as a landmark for countless impatient rendezvous. The hands of the logo’s clock are set at 7:13. In the evening, that would be the equivalent of 19:13 on a 24-hour clock — the year the terminal opened.

Michael Bierut and Joe Marianek of the firm Pentagram designed the logo. It uses the typeface Avenir Next, designed by Adrian Frutiger in 1988. It will supplant an interlocking monogram that now serves as the logo, and it’s intended to be used after the anniversary, when the “100 Years” line will be clipped off.

“By focusing on what is perhaps the one of the most famous clocks of all, we mark the passage of time on one hand, and the beginning of new journeys on the other,” said Randall J. Fleischer, a senior director of the railroad.

With all due respect, however, the information booth clock is not the only strong graphic image that could have been used. Grand Central presents many faces to the traveling public and to those who come in just to experience the place. (Or buy an iPad.)

If Metro-North had asked you to design a logo for Grand Central’s centenary and beyond, what would you have imagined? Something based on the Beaux-Arts architecture of the terminal? Would you have summoned the experience of commuting? Or of threading your way around slack-jawed tourists who stand rooted to the floor of the terminal — staring, no doubt, at the four-faced clock.

We welcome your ideas. Please send a JPEG file (preferred) or a PDF to [email protected] It needn’t be any larger than 1000 pixels in its greatest dimension. Your submission should look good on your own computer screen when it’s about five inches across or five inches high. We’ll publish a gallery of the best alternative logos before 2013 rolls around. Read our submission guidelines below.

By submitting to us, you are promising that the content is original, doesn’t plagiarize from anyone or infringe a copyright or trademark, doesn’t violate anybody’s rights and isn’t libelous or otherwise unlawful or misleading. You are agreeing that we can use your submission in all manner and media of The New York Times and that we shall have the right to authorize third parties to do so. And you agree to the rules of our Member Agreement, found online at http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/agree.html

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials
Go to Source

A Word From Our Sponsor On Reviewing Your Coverage

One of the best things a homeowner can do is to regular review their coverage for their coastal property insurance in New York. Insurance is a tricky matter. Although it is a plan for a future event, it is an event you hope does not happen. On the other hand, until it does happen, you cannot be certain that you have exactly the coverage you need. And once it does happen, you have no power to make adjustments. When choosing proper insurance, the best thing you can do is to carefully anticipate potential problems, and then make sure you have the coverage to adequately deal with those problems.

Two people are well-equipped to anticipate the special problems that can happen when owning coastal property. You are the first. You have a unique experience with the kind of wear and tear that can happen with homes located near the ocean. You are in a position to speak with your neighbors and add their experience to your own. Many of them may have suffered major damage at some point in their tenancy, and will have the experience to tell you what may have been strong or weak in their own insurance policies.

The second is your local representative for coastal property insurance in New York. They have the benefit of the experience of all of their clients, and can make sure you have a rock solid policy.

City Seeks to Become a New Internet Address

Businesses have long jockeyed for an address on Fifth Avenue — and the city is now hoping it can create a similar phenomenon online.

New York City is gearing up to apply for a new Internet domain with a .nyc suffix, a move made possible by a recent decision by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which oversees the Internet address system, to approve the creation of a large number of new so-called top-level domains.

The city is seeking a contract with a Virginia-based company, which would apply for the domain and operate and market it on the city’s behalf. The company would pay the upfront costs, and the city would get a share of revenue; under the five-year contract, it is guaranteed at least $3.6 million. London, Berlin, Paris, and Barcelona have said that they will also seek domains, but Rachel Sterne, the city’s chief digital officer, said she believed New York City was the only major city in the United States to be pursuing one.

Kevin Ryan, the founder and CEO of Gilt Groupe, a Web site that offers luxury goods, said that on a business level, the idea was an obvious one. “The domain space is a very lucrative space,” he said, since anyone starting a new business finds that every good name has already been taken. “Would I buy kevinryan.nyc? Yes. Would every business do it? Yes. So tens of thousands of people and businesses would buy that.”

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials
Go to Source

In North Brooklyn, Another Gay Bar Closes

One Wednesday in February at Veronica’s, the boss lined up shot glasses on the bar, opened a bottle of tequila and passed it down the line to her 14 employees.

The news was not going to be good. Because of mounting health department fines and a pending lawsuit from neighbors, the owners of Veronica People’s Club, a gay bar in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, told the staff that the bar would stop serving alcohol after 8 p.m.

A bar that stops serving at 8 is not a bar with a future. On St. Patrick’s Day, the other shoe dropped, and Veronica’s, which had flourished – sometimes too noisily for its neighbors’ liking — since opening in 2010, shut its doors after one last tearful party.

It has been a rough spell for gay bars in North Brooklyn: Blackout, a block down Greenpoint Avenue from Veronica’s, closed in November. And last month, the local community board voted to ask the state not to renew the license of the area’s most popular gay bar, Metropolitan in Williamsburg, after complaints that it regularly kept its outdoor patio open later than the law allowed. (The vote is unlikely to lead to any action because Metropolitan has had a relatively clean record, the state liquor authority said.)

While the reasons for the bars’ problems vary, and while many bars in the city, gay and straight alike, draw complaints from neighbors, some owners and patrons say they think anti-gay sentiments are a factor in neighborhoods with a conservative core of longtime residents.

Kelly Gorman, a promoter who hosted a weekly party at Blackout and started a Friday night party, Kielbasa, at Veronica’s, said many longtime Greenpointers “don’t necessarily want us there” and do not want their neighborhood to change, “especially when it comes to gay events.”

Though Blackout closed over an internal dispute, Louis Terline, who was one of the owners, said he sometimes felt harassed by his neighbors.

“All it takes is one crazy person to call 20 times a night until the police just don’t want to be bothered anymore,” Mr. Terline said.

A woman who would give her name only as Yvette and for more than 10 years has managed a deli on Franklin Street, on the block where Veronica’s is located, said, “I haven’t seen, personally, any real discrimination against gay people.” She said the neighborhood had welcomed a highly visible gay influx in recent years. “Of course,” she added, “people aren’t going to do it in public and let people know how they really feel.”

In Veronica’s case, the owners of the building next door charged in a lawsuit filed in December that “unreasonably loud music and noises of all sorts are emitted” from the bar at all hours and that the music sent vibrations through their apartment, causing them “to become nervous, anxious and agitated.”

The neighbors, Lena and Peter Jou, who bought their building 10 years ago, seek millions of dollars in damages and compensation for loss of property value.

None of the parties directly involved with the case would comment, citing the pending litigation. But Chris Barry, 29, who had been a bartender at Veronica’s, said the bar’s closing was a result of accumulating health department fines, which he said had doubled since the dispute with the neighbors began last year.

At its last graded inspection, in November, Veronica’s received a C and was cited for flies, having cold food stored at high temperatures, and not taking adequate steps against vermin. An inspection in January put the bar on track to receiving a B, with one “critical” sanitary violation for improperly using or storing a food utensil. No information was immediately available on fines levied against the bar.

Veronica’s, which opened in July 2010, regularly drew crowds to its Friday night dance parties and Monday evening viewings of the reality television show “RuPaul’s Drag Race.”

But Saturday’s crowd might have been the biggest ever. In the waning afternoon light, with most of the booze in the house consumed, one of the owners, Heather Millstone, climbed atop the bar to give a speech.

“Greenpoint’s a very special place,” she said through tears. “Thank you, guys.”

The crowd whooped and cheered once more.

Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Script | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials
Go to Source